#52: Varieties of Scientific Revolution pt. 2
(06/02/2022) In order for scientists to start a revolution, the case for revolution must emerge from the scientific process. But that process is heavily influenced by the underlying psychologies which produce the different worldviews found in different disciplines and sub-tendencies within disciplines. We introduce a coarse classification of distinct segments of academia and distinct segments of the power structure, which, by sheer coincidence, are both tripartite schemes. In the former: technics, literary experimentation, and science. In the latter: narcissists, strongmen, and technocrats. We examine how these tribes within academia can be defined by statistical ideological bias, epistemology, relationship to manipulation of the physical world, and degree of representation in settings of institutional power, relying heavily on Gambetta and Hertog's Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection between Violent Extremism and Education. We describe how institutional power is inhabited by technocrats and narcissists from the technics echelon of the academy, and how this implies that the civil resistance model, a default paradigm for ecological activism, is flawed.
Bibliography for episode 52:
Boem, C. (2001) Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press.
Chenowith, E. & Stephan, M. (2012) Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolence. Columbia University Press.
Engler, M. & Engler, P. (2016) This Is an Uprising: How Nonviolent Revolt Is Shaping the Twenty-First Century. Bold Type Books.
Figes, O. (1996) A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. Penguin Books.
Gambetta, D. & Hertog, S. (2016) Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection between Violent Extremism and Education. Princeton University Press.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2-3):61–83. doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x
McGilchrist, I. (2009) The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. Yale University Press.
Popovic, S. (2015) Blueprint for Revolution: How to Use Rice Pudding, Lego Men, and Other Nonviolent Techniques to Galvanize Communities, Overthrow Dictators, or Simply Change the World. Random House.
Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
Schmidt, J. (2000) Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes Their Lives. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Schutz, L. E. (2005) Broad-perspective perceptual disorder of the right hemisphere. Neuropsychology Review 15(1):11-27.
Sharp, G. (2010) From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation. Albert Einstein Institute. https://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/FDTD.pdf
Sperry, R. W. (1961) Cerebral organization and behavior: The split brain behaves in many respects like two separate brains, providing new research possibilities. Current Problems in Research 1749-1757.