The Biology of the Right-Left Divide pt. 3: Creepy, Hyper-Sentient Children
Updated: Dec 18, 2020
Having described the biology of aggression, we discuss the hypothesis that right-left political difference reflects variation in aggression and its correlated traits. We talk about prolonged development as a mechanism for human evolution and why this means we should expect innate variation in human aggression. We also discuss the problem of self-referentiality, the need for a map of humanity's cognitive tribes, and the relationship of ecological politics to left-right politics.
Bibliography for episode 3:
Caceres, M., Lachuer, J., Zapala, M. A., Redmond, J. C., Kudo, L., Geschwind, D. H., Lockhart, D. J., Preuss, T. M. & Barlow, C. (2003) Elevated gene expression levels distinguish human from non-human primate brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:13030–5.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution 20:469-93.
Hare, B. (2011) From Hominoid to Hominid Mind: What Changed and Why? Annual Review of Anthropology 40:293-309.
Hare, B. & Kwetuenda, S. (2009) Bonobos voluntarily share their own food with others. Current Biology 20(5):230-1.
Hare, B., Melis, A., Woods, V., Hastings, S. & Wrangham, R. (2007) Tolerance Allows Bonobos to Outperform Chimpanzees on a Cooperative Task. Current Biology 17:619–23.
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R. & Trut, L. (2005) Social Cognitive Evolution in Captive Foxes Is a Correlated By-Product of Experimental Domestication. Current Biology 15:226–30.
Hare, B., Wobber, V., & Wrangham, R. (2012) The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Animal Behaviour 83:573-85. Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M., Hare, B., and Tomasello, M. (2007) Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis. Science 317:1360-6.
Herrmann, E., Hare, B., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2010) Differences in the Cognitive Skills of Bonobos and Chimpanzees. PLoS One 5:e12438. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0012438
Kemmelmeir, M. (2008). Is there a relationship between cognitive ability and political orientation? A test of three hypotheses in two studies. Personality and Individual Differences 45:767-72.
Lakoff, G. 1994. Moral Politics. Chicago University Press.
Lorenz, K. (1950) Studies in Animal and Human Behavior vol. II. Harvard University Press.
Pennin, X., Berge, C. & Baylac, M. (2002) Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: Neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional procrustes analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 32:69-101.
Pinker, S. (1994) The Language Instinct: How The Mind Creates Language. William Morrow and Co.
Shea, B. (1989) Heterochrony in human evolution: the case for neoteny reconsidered. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 32:69-101.
Somel, M., Franz, H., Yan, Z., Lorenc, A., Guo, S., Giger, T., Kelso, J., Nickel, B., Dannemann, M. & Bahn, S. (2009) Transcriptional neoteny in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 106:5743-8.
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (p. 289–322). Oxford University Press.
Wilson, G.D. (1973) The psychology of conservativism. Academic Press.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992) The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (p. 289–322). Oxford University Press.
Wobber, V., Wrangham, R., & Hare, B. (2010a) Bonobos exhibit delayed development of social behavior and cognition relative to chimpanzees. Current Biology 20:226-30.
Wobber, V., Wrangham, R., & Hare, B. (2010b) Application of the heterochrony framework to the study of behavior and cognition. Communicative and Integrative Biology 3(4):337-339